Time and again spirited negotiations happen on internet fora regarding an examination of the status of a number of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a signal based longitudinal period astrofactor) along with karakamsha (the navamsha where the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is placed. As happens, some of the discussants began to branch to other side discussions which had nothing more to do with all the original questions or themes along with some became a bit exercised and emotional, as additionally often happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks are required so as to get into the underside of things and where sometimes a topic is being discussed on many unique boards and lots of topics simultaneously on a given board! As too is average, nothing was really resolved, and some of the regulars began expressing their frustrations about these issues coming up again and again again and directing people to archives . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are those that only limited hunting of past messages is possible without losing most one's hair, and the writings sometimes are kept onto another yahoo site which means that this will not help matters when everybody wants is to get a quick overview of what others are using and when possible their good reasons for embracing a certain position! This latter brings out more gall than good advice even though the intention of the person posing the question may have been very commendable and not in any way confrontational.
Somewhere, across the path with the former pursuit, still another topic got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the center of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers in the form of harmonic graphs. Now this is something that is found in Jyotish going straight back to almost the very first memories of the oldest members at the discussion who finally confessed to this type of situation. I myself, though myself perhaps not that mature, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn in the century before last where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha and dashamsha and thus forth and much more to the point had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan chart So, at least many people had been utilizing varga-charts a handful of 100 years ago and possibly even ahead of those times.
Somewhere throughout the conversation, in one of the lists, a number of the associates made available a post in which the writer had expressed thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas must not be utilised at a chart format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the important and relevant matter of the practical virtues of utilizing navamsha varga like an second chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra must be properly used and varga placements should only be used for discovering the features of planets .
Now, those who have studied BPHS would knowthat 16 vargas had been defined by the Sage starting with rashi ehich is also known as'kshetra' (field or area) and so on. This was indeed true and also a positive step ahead of the discussion. There were also parallel discussions going which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was not a good classic and written by one or a group of'latterday saints' [my word, not the original poster!] In Jyotish and for that reason can't be treated as a classic. Apparently, there was some support to this as could be similarly expected if somebody were to make a comment that Jyotish was just a derivative of Babylonian astrology which the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. A topic that has been understood to attract even untoward jyotishis out on the"war-path!"
To those who have been still interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there seemed to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be properly used. Additional varga kundalis will be the merchandise of tainted understanding of the classics which themselves many concur may not have lived in pristine form [although a few of these have mercifully survived in reasonably good shape1]. I do not know how a lot of this iceberg postulate is based data and just how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be applied as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also because of that consideration of their deities and primal forces people represent BUT perhaps not at the form of a horoscope and certainly no serious consideration must be given to aspects along with bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that as the 2nd dwelling lord at navamsha is a significant index, the fact that it is set in the 2 nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second dwelling in navamsha chart) isn't important. Or, for example, if Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, the two planets aren't related (though they'd be portrayed to be conjoined in precisely the same navamsha varga at a navamsha graph ).
(b) Regardless of whether specifically clarified or maybe not, one other flow of believing maintains that varga kundalis have a significant part to play in Jyotish and potentially are of significant utility in differentiating primary mandates matters pertaining to the prescription written by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, as an example, would hold significant influence within topics of marriage and spouse, while saptamsha graph would be of similar import from the examination of children in a specific nativity's reading. All these Vargas ought to be analyzed in a graph format.
There appeared to be a few different people who entirely denied the veracity of idea flow (b) and also a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps to avoid acrimony and becoming ensnared in the controversy. Or there were some other good reasons, known only to them.