Time and again spirited negotiations take place on internet fora regarding an study of the status of a number of jyotish parameters, including chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As happens, several of the discussants began to branch to other negative discussions that had nothing to do with the first questions or themes along with some became a bit resolved and emotional, as additionally usually happens on the internet where attention spans of weeks and days are required so as to get into the bottom of things and where some times a topic will be discussed on many diverse boards and many topics simultaneously on a given board! As too is average, nothing has been really resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning these issues coming up again and again and directing people to writings . Alas, the yahoo forums/fora are such that just limited searching of previous messages will be possible without losing most one's hair, and the writings sometimes are maintained onto yet another yahoo site so that this does not help matters when everybody wants is to get a quick overview of what others are already using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain location! This latter usually brings out more gall than good advice even though the aim of the individual posing the question may have been very commendable and not in any way confrontational. Knowing Jyotish does not protect one from harbouring Neurotic faculties!
Somewhere, across the path of the former quest, another topic got born and began questioning the use of varga kundalis or varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the core of jyotish and have already been used by tropical astrologers at the form of harmonic charts. Now this is something which is found in Jyotish going straight back to nearly the first memories of the earliest members in the forum who eventually confessed to this kind of case. I myself, though myself not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were attracted in the century before last where the jyotishi had attracted the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and therefore on and much more to the point had commented on these graphs in his reading. kalyan panel chart So, at least many people were utilizing varga-charts even a handful of hundred decades ago and conceivably perhaps even ahead of these times.
Somewhere during the discussion, in just one of the lists, a number of the associates made available an article in which the author had voiced thoughts to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be utilised at a graph format. A conversation ensued which sidestepped the more important and pertinent matter of the technical virtues of utilizing navamsha varga being an second chart. A couple of individuals requested for accusations in classics that indicates that ancient jyotishis advocated of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used and varga placements should only be used for discovering the features of planets .
One of those associates brought on all astrologers' attention that Parashara had described very plainly just how exactly to find out bhavas from the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th dwelling and trisection of their arcs, etc. in Chapter V of BPHS). This was really true and also a positive step ahead of the conversation. There were parallel discussions going which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was not even a timeless and written by one or a set of'latterday saints' [my term, not the initial poster's!] In Jyotish and consequently can't be treated as being a timeless. Evidently, there was some support for this as could be similarly expected if somebody were to produce a comment that Jyotish was only a derivative of astrology that the army that was included with Alexander brought to India. An issue that's been acknowledged to bring even sedate jyotishis on the"warpath!"
To individuals who have been interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there looked to be just two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Just Rashi horoscopes ought to be properly used. Additional varga kundalis were the product of corrupt understanding of the classics - which themselves many concur might not have lived in pure form [though a few of these have thankfully survived in fairly great shape1]. Underlying that is the view some can harbor that, alike the breeze, available Jyotish is just 1/10th of the whole human anatomy while the submerged 9/10th is mostly lost and partly hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas plus a number of the secret documents which exist nevertheless jealously guarded by the custodian families. I do not know just how a lot with the iceberg postulate is established data and just how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists of this particular stream of thought, vargas MUST simply be used as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and to that consideration of their deities and primal forces people represent however, maybe not at the form of a horoscope and certainly no serious consideration has to be given to aspects and bhava considerations. Only for clarity, they would assert, for example, that as the 2 nd dwelling lord at navamsha is an important index, the fact that it is set in the 2 nd navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in 2nd dwelling in navamsha graph ) isn't significant.
(b) Irrespective of if specifically described or not, one other flow of believing asserts that varga kundalis have a significant part to play at Jyotish and potentially are of significant usefulness in discerning chief mandates matters regarding the prescription written by sages. In other words, navamsha chart, as an example, would hold significant sway within topics of marriage and spouse, whilst saptamsha graph would be of import in the study of children in a particular nativity's reading. All these Vargas ought to be examined in a graph format.
I don't really recall anybody in the'camp (b)' saying that the very first part of (a) is not correct, namely, the Varga rankings have to be contemplated, by itself, to get an study of strength and quality of a globe as prescribed within the Jyotish frame. In fact, the majority of these utilized theories from both (a) and (b) streams. There seemed to be some different individuals who totally denied the veracity of thought flow (b) and also a few were a little taciturn about any of this, perhaps to prevent acrimony and becoming ensnared from the controversy. Or perhaps there were some other reasons, known only for them.